Suffering as Stumbling Block, Matt. 16:21-28

Nowhere is the power that the fear of suffering can have on faith more evident than in Matthew 16.  Peter goes from being the rock on which Jesus will build his church (v. 18) to a “stumbling block” to Jesus just five short verses later.   How is that possible?   Because Jesus raises the ugly specter of suffering as a prerequisite for Christian discipleship.

Suffering is not my favorite thing about being a Christian. In fact, if we were to do a David Letterman top 10 list of my favorite things about being a Christian, suffering wouldn’t even be on it.   I really identify with Peter when he argues with about his need to suffer and die.  But Jesus’ reaction is swift and sharp.  He says, “Get behind me Satan!  You are a stumbling block to me.”  Pretty harsh reply from Jesus, don’t you think?   But maybe it’s not as nasty as it sounds if we look more carefully at that story.  Jesus goes on to say, “Take up your cross and follow me.”

Remember the old childhood game, follow the leader?  Following requires that we get behind the leader.   In elementary school, students line up behind the teacher or other designated leader to go everywhere; it’s what followers do.  Jesus is just reminding Peter (and us) of where we need to be.  We need to get behind our leader, and this leader that we profess to follow, whose name we claim as Christians, makes it clear over and over again that cross bearing is part of what we have signed on for at our baptism.  It’s in the fine print!

For Christians, suffering goes with the territory, unless we want to give up the reward for genuine suffering, which is eternal life here and forever.  In Romans 8, Paul says, “We suffer with Christ so that we may be glorified with him.”   But we still wish it wasn’t so, don’t we?

Four years ago some members of my church gathered with other Christians on Good Friday for an annual ecumenical Cross Walk.  They process silently down the main street of Dublin, Ohio carrying a large wooden cross.    This community witness has been going on for years and all was well on Good Friday 2007 until the group realized that the communication about who was responsible for supplying the cross had broken down.  They were ready for the Cross Walk but had no cross with which to walk.  So one of the members of my church had to make a hasty trip to the church to get the cross.  After a few broken speed laws, the walk proceeded a few minutes later than planned.

When I first heard that story, I said, “That’ll preach!”  Wouldn’t we love to have Easter without the suffering and pain of Good Friday, the garden of Gethsemane, the betrayal and denial that broke Jesus’ heart long before the executioners broke his body?  I would.  I am not a fan of the no-pain-no-gain school for either exercise or theology.  If there is an easier way to get in shape than sweating and having sore muscles, I’m all over it.  And if someone can find an easy path to salvation, I’ll be the tour guide.  But, oops, there’s that nasty verse in the Sermon on the Mount, (Mt. 7:13-14) that says the wide easy freeway leads to destruction, and that’s the one without the cross.  That’s the one most people choose, because it looks easier and lots more fun in the short run.  But when it comes to matters of faith, don’t we want to focus on goals and consequences for eternity, not just the path of least resistance for today?

There are different kinds of suffering, and some are easier to deal with than others.  First, and easiest in some ways, is the kind of suffering we bring upon ourselves. Charlie Sheen comes to mind as one of this year’s nominees in that category.  Tiger Woods was last year unanimous winner.  You can think of other nominees, less famous ones, perhaps, and if we’re honest we could all be on that list at one time or another.  The difference for most of us is that we aren’t celebrities.  Our screw ups usually don’t show up the CBS Evening News or in big bold tabloid headlines for the world to read in the checkout line at Kroger’s.  But that doesn’t mean they are any less painful or hard to live with.    Mistakes have consequences which mean they usually hurt us and/or other people, and hurting is a form of suffering.  We all make bad choices, it goes with our free will that none of us want to give up.   We make bad choices that impact our health.  We drive when we are distracted by electronic gadgets or when our judgment isn’t 100%.  We say things in anger that we regret and break promises to people we love.  We give into worldly pressure to succeed or cut corners, knowing we’re violating our own values.   We may get away with it for awhile, or think we have, but sooner or later, our chickens come home to roost and we suffer.

That kind of suffering is very painful and hard to deal with, in part because there’s no one else to blame but ourselves; but at least self-inflicted suffering makes some sense.  We can understand where it comes from and why.

The second type of suffering makes less sense to me.  We only have to remember the heart-wrenching images of the Tsunami in Japan to feel the suffering of innocent, helpless people, thousands of them, minding their own business one minute and suddenly swept up in what looked like a science fiction movie about the end of the world the next.  The nuclear fallout, pun intended, adds insult to injury when we think about the irony of the only nation ever victimized by nuclear weapons now, 66 years later, experiencing the ravages of the worst nuclear accident in world history.  Sure, you could make a case for putting that suffering up in category number one.  Building nuclear reactors is risky business at best, and God help us if we don’t understand that now, but to build them in earthquake and tsunami territory, is highly questionable, as hind sight so clearly shows us.

But I digress, suffering type number 2 is the kind caused by natural disasters or criminal attacks, or lung cancer in someone who has never smoked a cigarette– the kind for which there is no justification or cause we can find.  Innocent children who are physically or emotionally or sexually abused.  Faithful spouses who are cheated on, taken advantage of and left with nothing to sustain life.  You get the picture.

This is a good place to clarify what suffering isn’t.  Shortly after the earthquake and tsunami, the governor of Tokyo made a public pronouncement that he believed this disaster was divine retribution on the people of Japan for their greed.  This gentleman is a follower of the Shinto religion, and I have no knowledge whatsoever of what Shinto theology is.  I do know there are those in most religions who resort to blaming God when we can’t figure any other way to justify or explain why bad things happen.  Christianity is not exempt from such bad theology.  We all remember the Christian preachers who claimed that hurricane Katrina devastated the gulf coast a few years ago because of the sin and wickedness of the Big Easy.

Please understand, I’m not saying actions don’t have consequences or that sin doesn’t cause suffering – those things are built into the natural order of things.  But that does not mean that the loving God I know and worship would kick people when they’re down by saying “Gotcha” or “Take that, sinner” over the broken and shattered ruins of a devastated life or city or nation.  When we need God’s comfort and strength and presence the very most, in times of tragedy and loss and despair, would God choose that time to teach us a lesson?  NO, that is the time that Emmanuel, God with us, carries us and comforts us.  When we suffer, God is close enough to taste the salt of our tears.

Now, I know we can find plenty of places in the Bible where we are told that God punishes sinners with plagues and boils and hell fire and damnation, and we need to deal with that problem head on.  The Bible was written over centuries by many different authors who were trying to answer the hardest questions and mysteries of life.  Those who experienced God in their suffering as punitive and judgmental wrote about that experience, and almost all of them did so without the benefit of knowing Jesus Christ, the best revelation possible for embracing our loving, forgiving, grace-full God.

We need to remind ourselves that many Jews who wrote their Bible, our Old Testament, also knew the loving, merciful side of God.  That compassionate part of God’s nature had just not come into clear focus for them as it did in the incarnation of God in Jesus.  We sometimes forget that many of the most beloved images of God – like the good shepherd of Psalm 23, come from the Hebrew Scriptures.  The very essence of Jesus’ teaching, the great commandments to love God with all one’s heart, soul, strength, and mind, and to love your neighbor as yourself come straight from Deuteronomy 6:4 and Leviticus 19:18.

To go a big step further, Christians believe that suffering is not just a necessary evil but actually a positive quality of Christian life.  Romans 5:3-4 says we even boast about our suffering, not because of some masochistic streak, but because suffering produces endurance, character and hope.  It’s fairly easy to see how the first two kinds of suffering, self-inflicted and undeserved, can build endurance and maybe character, but what about hope?  We need a 3rd kind of suffering to understand how it builds Hope, and that is what followers of Jesus do when we voluntarily take on suffering as an act of sacrificial compassion.

The reason Christians embrace and even boast about suffering, and the reason Jesus invites us to take up our cross and follow him, is that com-passion is essential to the Christian faith.  The word “compassion” comes from two Greek words that mean to suffer with.  Compassion is the kind of love Jesus came to teach and live.  Compassion is the love we feel for neighbors and enemies we don’t even know, simply because we share a common human condition.  Compassion is what we feel for the Japanese because we identify and empathize with them and share their suffering as fellow members of the human family.  We feel their pain because, as one of my students told me recently, God doesn’t have grandchildren – just children; so our fellow human beings are not cousins once or twice removed, but are siblings – brothers and sisters together with Christ.

Compassion is a key to God’s very nature.  Why else would God allow Jesus to suffer and die for us while we are yet sinners?   When John 3:16 tells us that God so loved the world that he gave us Jesus – that’s compassion and empathy to the max.    God becomes one of us in human form to share our existence, including our suffering.

Understanding Christian suffering as compassion helps us overcome the stumbling block that suffering and the cross can be.  Just as Jesus labels Peter’s resistance to suffering as a stumbling block, Paul describes the cross as a stumbling block for prospective Christians in I Corinthians 1:23.  Our aversion to pain and suffering is a natural component of that stumbling block, but mistakenly blaming God for our suffering only compounds the problem.

One unfortunate way this happens is when the suffering of Jesus on the cross is portrayed as a necessary sacrifice or punishment required by God for the sins of the world.  A prime example of that theology was Mel Gibson’s awful 2004 film, “The Passion of Christ.”  A God who would intentionally inflict that kind of brutal suffering on his own son is not one I want to follow.  But when we experience the cross of Christ as an act of compassion and sacrificial love, that kind of suffering is much easier to embrace and to imitate in our own lives.

The suffering of the cross for Jesus is an example writ large about how a person of faith handles suffering.  Jesus doesn’t repay evil for evil; he doesn’t lash out in violent anger when he is suffering.  He continues to live life in harmony with the will of God, bearing the ultimate suffering in love, compassion and forgiveness – staying true to the way of love which is the essence of life and of God.  How can we follow Christ’s example and take on the suffering of life with character and hope?  Paul says, “Hope does not disappoint us [even in the worst of times] because God’s love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit that has been given to us.” (Romans 5:5)  We can’t line up behind Jesus and follow his lead, but God living in us can.

The cross is both a symbol of suffering and hope, because if Jesus’ life ended on Good Friday, suffering would be the final fate of human kind.  Death would define our existence.  But hold the phone; we know the rest of this story.  For those who don’t give up and leave the ball game when the score looks hopeless, there is good news.   As post-resurrection people we already know that suffering and death are not the final chapter in our story.  Thanks be to God’s ultimate, victorious will, we can endure suffering and even embrace it because we know it builds our character and makes us people of hope with Easter in our eyes.

Many years ago I did a funeral service for an elderly woman who had been in a great marriage for over 50 years.  The loss of his life-long companion was very painful for her husband, Walter, but her death was also a release from weeks of suffering from the cancer that killed her.  A few days after the funeral I stopped by to visit with Walter and I asked him how he was doing.  I’ll never forget his reply.  He said, “Steve, I’m doing OK.  I miss Myrtle terribly, but I know she’s in a better place now; so I’m smiling through my tears.”

We boast in our suffering because it is a sign of love and compassion that we voluntarily embrace as the way and truth and life of the one we are proud to call our leader – the one we take up our crosses and follow, smiling through the tears of sacrificial suffering and compassion.

Wanted: More Collaborators, Romans 12:1-8; Exodus 1:8-2:10

Romans 12 is one of those many familiar passages in the New Testament that praises humility, collaboration and teamwork, qualities that are sorely lacking in our fearful recession-plagued society and world.  What a great time to be reminded of the value our unique individual gifts can contribute to addressing complex social problems.

The Hebrew slaves in Exodus (1:8-2:10) were up an even bigger creek without a paddle than we are today, and that narrative provides a marvelous illustration of what collaboration and teamwork look like.  Most of us think of Moses as the great leader of liberation for the Hebrew exodus from slavery in Egypt.   He’s the one who boldly stares down Pharaoh, one of the most powerful rulers in the world, and demands freedom for God’s people.  True, it helped that he had divine intervention to back him up.  Those persuasive plagues God inflicts on Pharaoh’s people certainly make for memorable drama in Hollywood retellings of the Exodus story, be it the old Charlton Heston version or Disney’s animated “Prince of Egypt.”

Most people know something about Moses.  Shiphrah and Puah on the other hand are far from household names, and yet without those minor characters in this drama, there would have been no Moses and no Exodus.  Without the brave little slave girl, Miriam, and her courageous mother and their creative manipulation of Pharaoh’s daughter’s maternal compassion, Moses, the great liberator would not have survived the first year of life.  What a wonderful twist in this story (Exodus 2:5-9) when Moses’ sister tricks Pharaoh’s daughter into giving Moses back to his mother to nurse him.  The mother not only gets her son back but even gets paid for providing childcare.

The great African-American Preacher, James Forbes, preached on the Exodus story several years ago at the Schooler Institute on Preaching at the Methodist Theological School in Ohio (“Let My Leaders Go,” Nov. 13, 1990).  I still use a recording of that sermon regularly in the preaching classes I teach.  The essence of the sermon is that without the contributions of the “minor” characters in what Forbes calls “Phase I” of the liberation process, there could have been no Phase II led by Moses and his brother Aaron. 

In Romans 12 Paul says “do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so that you may discern what is the will of God— what is is good and acceptable and perfect.”  The world’s order to the midwives is explicit and unambiguous.  They were to kill all the Hebrew boy babies at birth.  But the midwives were blessed with the ability to discern the will of God.  They were not conformed to the world and “did not do as the king of Egypt commanded them, but they let the boys live.”  When called on the royal carpet by the King himself to account for their disobedience of his decree the midwives are not intimidated because they feared God and knew where their ultimate obedience belonged.  They stand up to Pharaoh and exercise what Forbes calls “prophetic license,” telling a little white lie about how the Hebrew women are so vigorous that their babies are born before the midwives even arrive on the scene.

So Pharaoh tries a new tactic.  He orders all the male Hebrew baby boys thrown into the Nile after they are born.  And up steps another minor player in the drama.  A slave woman gives birth to a son, hides him for three months and then does what Pharaoh has commanded, sort of.  She puts her infant son into the river; only first she makes him a little boat to keep him afloat. Then she places her precious child in the most famous bulrushes in the world, strategically choosing the  spot where she knows Pharaoh’s daughter will find him because she regularly bathes there. 

Moses’ mother and sister exercise what Paul calls “sober judgment, each according to the measure of faith that God has assigned.”  They creatively and courageously do what is necessary to preserve the life of Israel’s future liberator.  What seem like insignificant actions by the midwives, the mother and sister, and Pharaoh’s daughter are all necessary components of the larger plot that unfolds many years later (Exodus 3) when God speaks to Moses in a burning bush and convinces him to step forward and confront the terrible injustice being inflicted on God’s people.

But notice that not even the great leader Moses is expected to do that daunting task alone.  And no wonder.  God is asking Moses to stand up to challenge one of the most powerful men in the world.  And one has to wonder how complicated this situation was since Moses’ adversary is none other than the one who had raised him and provided graciously for him in his own palace for many years.   Quite understandably Moses tries to talk his way out of this dangerous mission to confront the might of Pharaoh.  And what does God do?  Like a good coordinator, God provides a partner to fill some of Moses’ voids.  Moses’ brother Aaron is recruited to join Moses’ team, bringing his own unique gifts.  One of Moses’ excuses to God is that he isn’t a good public speaker; so God says, OK, we’ll get Aaron to do that part.  Sound familiar?  “We have gifts that differ according to the grace given us: ….. the exhorter in exhortation; … the leader in diligence.” (Rom. 12:6-8)

What daunting tasks do we face today that require partnership with others who have gifts different than our own?  Whatever the challenge, personal or social, local or global, the good news is that no matter how polarized our nation and world may seem, we are “one body in Christ, and individually members one of another.”   We are not alone, even though it often feels that way.  In these challenging times it is good to remember the wisdom of Benjamin Franklin at another crisis point in the life of the American people.  At the signing of the Declaration of Independence Franklin told his fellow collaborators, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”

Rugged individualism and mistrust of others won’t solve complex problems.  We need desperately to collaborate with each other and with God as illustrated in these two anonymous readings, one humorous, one serious, both true:

 The first is a letter from a client to his insurance company.

“I am writing in response to your request for more information concerning block #11 on the insurance form which asks for “cause of injuries” wherein I put “trying to do the job alone”.  You said you need more information, so I trust the following will be sufficient.

I am a bricklayer by trade and on the day of the injuries, I was working alone laying bricks around the top of a four story building when I realized that I had about 500 pounds of bricks left over.  Rather than carry the bricks down by hand, I decided to put them into a barrel and lower them by a pulley which was fastened to the top of the building.  I secured the end of the rope at ground level and went up to the top of the building and loaded the bricks into the barrel and swung the barrel out with the bricks in it.   I then went down and untied the rope, holding it securely to insure the slow descent of the barrel.

As you will note on block #6 of the insurance form, I weigh 145 pounds.  Due to my shock at being jerked off the ground so swiftly, I lost my presence of mind and forgot to let go of the rope.  Between the second and third floors, I met the barrel coming down.  This accounts for the bruises and lacerations on my upper body.

Regaining my presence of mind, I held tightly to the rope and proceeded rapidly up the side of the building, not stopping until my right hand was jammed in the pulley.  This accounts for the broken thumb.

Despite the pain, I retained my presence of mind and held tightly on to the rope.  At approximately the same time, however, the barrel of bricks hit the ground and the bottom fell out of the barrel.  Devoid of the weight of the bricks, the barrel now weighted about 50 pounds.  I again refer you to block #6 and my weight.

As you would guess I began a rapid descent.  In the vicinity of the second floor, I met the barrel coming up.  This explains the injuries to my legs and lower body.  Slowed only slightly, I continued my descent landing on the pile of bricks.  Fortunately, my back was only sprained and the internal injuries were minimal.

I am sorry to report, however, that at this point, I finally lost my presence of mind and let go of the rope, and as you can imagine, the empty barrel crashed down on me.

I trust this answers your concern.  Please know that I am finished ‘trying to do the job alone.’

How about you”?

 

The second reading I first saw in a publication from the Roman Catholic Maryknoll Sisters.

“And the Lord said, ‘GO!’
And I said, ‘who me?’
And God said, ‘Yes you.’

And I said,
‘But I’m not ready yet
And there is studying to be done.
I’ve got this part-time job.
You know how tight my schedule is.’
And God said, ‘You’re stalling.’

Again the Lord said, ‘GO!’
And I said, ‘I don’t want to.’
And God said, ‘I Didn’t Ask If You Wanted To.’
And I said,
‘Listen I’m not the kind of person
To get involved in controversy.
Besides my friends won’t like it
And what will my roommate think?
And God said, ‘Baloney.’

And yet a third time the Lord said, ‘GO!’
And I said, ‘do I have to?’
And God said, ‘Do You Love Me?’
And I said,
‘Look I’m scared.
People are going to hate me
And cut me into little pieces.
I can’t take it all by myself.’
And God said, ‘Where Do You Think I’ll Be?’

And the Lord said, ‘GO!’
And I sighed’
‘Here I am…send me.’

Feedback

Looking for feedback – what do you like or not like about my blog so far?  What would be more helpful for you.  Please leave me your comments.  Thanks, Steve

“Names and Labels,” Matthew 15:21-28

 The great American cowboy philosopher/comedian, Will Rogers, once said he had never met a man he didn’t like.  Most of us can’t make that claim.  Most of us are subtly or consciously conditioned to be uncomfortable with people who are different than ourselves. 

 Rodgers and Hammerstein captured that human proclivity for prejudice so well in the lyrics to “Carefully Taught,” in their musical “South Pacific.”

 “You’ve got to be taught
To hate and fear,
You’ve got to be taught
From year to year,
It’s got to be drummed
In your dear little ear
You’ve got to be carefully taught.

You’ve got to be taught to be afraid
Of people whose eyes are oddly made,
And people whose skin is a diff’rent shade,
You’ve got to be carefully taught.

You’ve got to be taught before it’s too late,
Before you are six or seven or eight,
To hate all the people your relatives hate,
You’ve got to be carefully taught!”

Ever been uncomfortable around a person in Muslim dress?  Or someone driving a much nicer car than yours?  Or the tech support person in India who speaks a different kind of English than we do?  Or are we ever like the little girl staring at a priest with a clerical collar, wondering why he was wearing it?  When he noticed her curiosity he took off the collar to show it to her and she noticed some words on the inside (which were cleaning instructions).  When the priest asked the little girl if she knew what the words said, she replied, “Yes, it says ‘kills fleas for 6 months.’”

We all have foot in mouth disease at time and say things that we regret.  Even if we feel that “political correctness” has gone too far, at our best we don’t want to offend others or embarrass ourselves.  And we certainly expect Jesus to be a super Will Rogers.  Jesus surely wasn’t prejudiced.  He never met a person he didn’t love.   He welcomes children to his lap and carries the lamb in his bosom, heals lepers, eats with sinners.  He had compassion on all those people who forgot to bring their picnic lunch to his revival.

But what about this incredible story in Matthew 15 where Jesus dismisses a hurting, desperate mother begging for help for her tormented daughter?  This Canaanite woman reminds me of the haunting pictures we see of starving mothers in Somalia pleading for scraps of food for their children.  Who could refuse to help?  But not only does Jesus tell this woman to bug off, he adds insult to injury by calling her a ‘dog’ because of her religion and her nationality.  Say it isn’t so Jesus!  He tells her, “You’re not my problem, lady.  I’m just here for the lost house of Israel.”  Don’t you just love it when you can pass the buck and ignore a difficult situation because “that’s not in my job description?”  Quite a different story though when “customer service” people pull that one on you though, isn’t it?

Sure, it helps that Jesus changes his tune 7 verses later, but that judgmental, uncaring behavior is so out of character for Jesus that it boggles the mind.  We expect that attitude from the disciples or the self-righteous Pharisees, but Jesus?  Jesus first just ignores the woman, doesn’t even acknowledge she exists, and then he shocks us by agreeing with the disciples when they ask him to send her away because she’s annoying them.

Maybe Jesus was just having a bad day.  We all have those, and Jesus certainly had plenty with the disciples and his own people.  Maybe he was angry at the people of Israel for rejecting him and his teaching.  If those descendents of Abraham and Moses didn’t get it, how in the world could he expect this “heathen” woman to?  Or maybe he was testing the woman’s persistence and faith.  We have no way of knowing.  But the question this story raises for us today is that if Jesus is capable of this kind of exclusionary, judgmental behavior, what hope is there for you and me to get past our preconceived notions about other people?  What hope is there for ever having peace in our ever-shrinking global village if even Jesus builds walls instead of bridges?

During the build up to the first Iraq war a young fighter pilot, barely old enough to drive was asked about the young men in Iraq who were also preparing to go to war.  The young pilot admitted he hadn’t thought about them, but when he did, he said, “I guess they’re fighting for what they believe, just like we are.  They only know what they’ve been told.”  What a tremendous insight, especially if we realize that we are in that same boat and need to examine our own taken-for-granted beliefs and attitudes carefully if we ever hope to love our neighbors as ourselves.

This story of Jesus and the Canaanite woman is a great opportunity to examine what happens to people and relationships when we resort to using labels instead of names.  The woman in this text is never called by name.  At best she is referred to as “a Canaanite Woman.”  In that culture, that’s already two strikes against her.  At worst she is called a “dog.”  Names are very personal.  Labels are cold and lump people into categories.  We label our “enemies” all the time so we can kill them without too much guilt.  It is much easier to kill “gooks,” “Krauts,” “Japs,” “Commies,” “Savages,” “Queers,” “Infidels,” than it is real human beings with names and families, hopes and dreams.  That demonizing and depersonalizing is even more dangerous today when many battles are fought remotely with drones and missiles so we never see the fear and humanity in the eyes of the “other.”  We do the same thing when we stereotype political rivals and create polarization that makes rational debate and compromise on issues of critical importance to the common good of our nation and the world almost impossible. 

It is far easier to dismiss a class or race of people before we get to know one of “them” as an individual.  To personally know a relative or friend who is gay or lesbian changes our perspective on gay rights.  Why?  Because now he or she has a name and not just a label.  One size does not fit all when it comes to human beings.  We are all unique and special and cannot be tucked into generalized categories if we ever want peace in our diverse and multi-cultural world.

How much better for all of us if we can learn to accept and affirm our differences and celebrate our common humanity like two young girls, one Jewish, one Christian.  Hannah, the former, says, “I’m Passover; she’s Easter.  I’m Hanukah, she’s Christmas.  But I’m glad we’re both Halloween.” 

Matthew’s story of the Canaanite woman also teaches us to look for genuine faith wherever we find it, not just where we expect it to be.  True faith is too rare to risk missing it because of what we’ve been “taught to hate and fear.”  Jesus didn’t expect to find faith in the Canaanite woman, but he gets surprised.  Jesus is actually converted in this story.  We don’t expect Jesus to need conversion do we, but that’s exactly what happens.  He is turned around by this woman’s faith.  He no longer sees an annoying, nagging, needy “dog,” but opens his eyes to see a frightened, hurting mother who is filled with persistence and faith and love.  She is so full of love and faith that she is willing to risk humiliation and rejection herself to try and save her daughter. 

And the result of her witness and courage is that Jesus says, “Woman, great is your faith!  Let it be done for you as you wish.”  “And her daughter is healed instantly.”

That’s a great miracle but wait till you hear the rest of the story.  This encounter marks a dramatic shift in Jesus’ ministry.  The converted Jesus no longer limits his mission to the House of Israel.  He begins to promote the universal gospel proclaimed in the Hebrew Scriptures, where Abraham’s covenant with Yahweh is to be a blessing to “all the families of the earth” (Gen. 12:3).  Isaiah echoes that vision of God’s servants being “a light to the nations” (42:6), and Jonah’s big fish tale is all about God’s sending him to preach salvation to Israel’s hated enemies in Nineveh.   That message reaches its climax at the end of Matthew’s gospel where Jesus exits stage right with the challenge to all of us disciples that we know today as the Great Commission:  “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations.” 

We cannot fulfill that commission if we let labels blind us to who people really are – children of God, our sisters and brothers.

An anonymous author puts it this way:

A pilgrim asked a sage, “When can I tell the difference between the darkness and the dawn?  Is it when I can tell a sheep from a goat, or a peach from a pomegranate? “

“No,” said the wise one.  “It is when you can look in the eyes of another person and say, ‘you are my sister.  You are my brother.’  Until then, there is no dawn, there is only darkness.” 

 

Family Jealousy, Genesis 37

[Note:  I decided to do a Bible study blog this week after all]

The phrase “dysfunctional family” is redundant and apparently always has been if the Biblical record is any indication.  We all have embarrassing stories about our families or meeting the prospective in-laws for the first time.  And those are minor issues compared to abusive or violent situations that are all too common, especially in times of great economic and personal stress and pressure.

We’ve all had those moments when a parent pulls out our naked baby pictures to show to a friend or date, and now with You Tube and other digital demons, the opportunities for embarrassing photos being widely disseminated has increased exponentially.  Many of us have had times when we would like to sell a sibling to a passing band of Ishmaelites, but Joseph’s brothers actually do it. 

No family is perfect.  We sometimes look at affluent neighborhoods with manicured lawns and assume those living there have lives that are as impressive as the facades of their large beautiful homes.  But no socio-economic class is immune from jealousy, insecurity, tragedy and other causes of brokenness.  Earlier chapters of Genesis detail family conflicts between Cain and Able, Jacob and Esau, and now the critical Joseph saga that is prelude to slavery in Egypt and the Exodus salvation of God’s people begins in a tale of sibling rivalry and jealousy that goes rapidly from bad to worse.

Before we get to the oppression of the Hebrews by Pharaoh we encounter some within Jacob’s family, within God’s own people.  Perhaps this is a reminder that before we cast too many stones at those ” bad people” out there, we should do some introspection and recognize the logs in our own eyes.  No problems can be addressed in a family or any relationship until we first recognize they are there.   When Jacob tells Joseph (vs. 14) to go “see if it is well with your brothers,” he is inquiring about their well-being, their peace/shalom.  We see very quickly there is no peace in Shechem where Joseph’s brothers are plotting fratricide and finally compromise on selling him and lying about his death at the hands of a wild animal. 

The authors of this story want to make very sure we know this is about a family.  The word brother appears 20 times, father 10 times and son 8, and there is plenty of blame to go around for all of the above.  It is easy to see the sins of the brothers who sell Joseph, but as is often the case in athletic events, the secondary offender is often the one called for the infraction because, especially in the good old days before instant replay, the initiator of a conflict escapes the notice of the referee.  Joseph and Jacob need to share the blame for this family crisis.  Jacob blew his paternal responsibilities by playing favorites among his sons and Joseph eggs his brothers on by bragging about his dreams and his special treatment from Daddy, and in general being a tattle tale. 

My point is that evil is not just out there in the villains du jour, be they Egyptians or Joseph’s brothers or our contemporary religious or political enemies.  There is jealousy and unkindness and chicanery among the household of God too, then and now.  We can’t do anything about Jacob’s dysfunctional family.  That’s history.  But we can learn from their mistakes and realize that jealousy or competition or putting on holier-than-thou airs like Joseph does will not work well as evangelistic strategies for the church today.  To attract new disciples into the church requires a level of genuine honesty and authenticity possible only when we feel secure in our own faith relationship with a loving, forgiving God.  The value of being secure and real is captured in a great quote from the beautiful children’s story, “The Velveteen Rabbit,” by Margery Williams:

“The Skin Horse had lived longer in the nursery than any of the others. He was so old that his brown coat was bald in patches and showed the seams underneath, and most of the hairs in his tail had been pulled out to string bead necklaces. He was wise, for he had seen a long succession of mechanical toys arrive to boast and swagger, and by-and-by break their mainsprings and pass away, and he knew that they were only toys, and would never turn into anything else. For nursery magic is very strange and wonderful, and only those playthings that are old and wise and experienced like the Skin Horse understand all about it.

“What is REAL?” asked the Rabbit one day, when they were lying side by side near the nursery fender, before Nana came to tidy the room. “Does it mean having things that buzz inside you and a stick-out handle?”

“Real isn’t how you are made,” said the Skin Horse. “It’s a thing that happens to you. When a child loves you for a long, long time, not just to play with, but REALLY loves you, then you become Real.”

“Does it hurt?” asked the Rabbit.

“Sometimes,” said the Skin Horse, for he was always truthful. “When you are Real you don’t mind being hurt.”

“Does it happen all at once, like being wound up,” he asked, “or bit by bit?”

“It doesn’t happen all at once,” said the Skin Horse. “You become. It takes a long time. That’s why it doesn’t happen often to people who break easily, or have sharp edges, or who have to be carefully kept. Generally, by the time you are Real, most of your hair has been loved off, and your eyes drop out and you get loose in the joints and very shabby. But these things don’t matter at all, because once you are Real you can’t be ugly, except to people who don’t understand.”

“I suppose you are real?” said the Rabbit. And then he wished he had not said it, for he thought the Skin Horse might be sensitive.

But the Skin Horse only smiled.”

Jealousy is certainly not the only cause of conflict in human relationships, but it is high on the list.  Comparison of oneself to others is always dangerous because there will always be some better or worse off.  Coveting, a synonym for jealousy, is so dangerous it merits its own place as one of the 10 commandments.  Why is that?  Some would argue that competition is good motivation to try harder, and there is truth to that.  Competition can inspire great achievements, e.g. the landing of humans on the moon was powered as much by competition with the USSR as it was by solid rocket fuel.   But competition becomes destructive when the value of persons and not their accomplishments become the standard of measurement as happens in the Joseph story. 

When we feel insecure and are motivated by an economy of scarcity no amount of wealth, power, or prestige is ever enough.  Keeping up with the Joneses is quickly transformed into staying ahead of them.  Winning in business or athletics trumps integrity and community resulting in use of illegal performance enhancing drugs or unethical business practices.  Winning an election becomes more important than serving the public good.  Self-interest clouds wise and impartial judgment.  People who start down a career path intending to do good become blinded by the desire to do well. 

In many ways our culture teaches us to be discontent in whatever state we are in – always wanting more in a consumer crazy culture – always thinking the grass is greener on the other side of the fence or tracks, only to discover when we get there that it is artificial turf. 

We are all part of God’s family in desperate need to learn to live together peaceably.  The width and breadth of the interconnectedness of the human family is lifted up for us very subtly in the final verse of this text from Genesis 37.  (Ignore the confusion in this story about whether the traders who bought Joseph were Ishmaelites or Midianites.  It says both and this is likely from the combination of two versions of this story.) 

It is the late reference to Midianites in this text that intrigues me because centuries later in this story of God’s people (Exodus 2), Moses, the hero of the Exodus story, marries Zipporah, daughter of Reuel/Jethro, a priest of Midian.  It’s a small world because we are all sisters and brothers in God’s family and need to learn to live together like real siblings should.

On Vacation

My Bible Study blog will return next week with another post on a new lectionary text.

My Book on Amazon & Barnes & Noble

My book, Building Peace from the Inside Out is now available on Amazon and Barnes and Noble, in addition to lulu.com. 

Building Peace from the Inside Out  is not a book that tells about peace.  It is a collection of inspirational plays and stories that show by positive and negative example what peace looks and feels like. The characters in this book wrestle with common challenges of the human condition: ageism, materialism, insecurity and self-centeredness. They illustrate the destructive results of fear, anger, hate, prejudice, a lack of vision and integrity. 

On the positive side of the ledger, there are also characters who embody and live out values that lead to peace. They demonstrate that peace requires openness to surprise and how compassion is critical to any hope for peace and justice. Through narrative, we see how the “have-nots” can teach the “haves” what brings real peace in our lives—integrity, courage, and forgiveness.  The power of having a vision and the courage to trust and follow one’s purpose also show up repeatedly on these journeys to peace.  

A portion of all proceeds from this book will be donated to three peacemaking organizations:

Habitat for Humanity

C. Everett and Mary Tilson Fund for Social Justice Ministries, Methodist Theological School in Ohio

Tariq Khamisa Foundation, an education program to end youth violence

 

Matthew 14:13-21, “All We Have is Enough”

Matthew 14:13-21, “All We Have is Enough,”  Gospel Lesson for July 31, 2011

The old Beatles’ song, “Eleanor Rigby,” has a haunting refrain that says, “All the lonely people, where do they all come from?”   I don’t know where they come from, but I know to whom they come – the church.  They come hungering for physical and spiritual food.  Frederick Beuchner says it’s not the presence of God that keeps us coming back to church every week, but the absence, the hunger.  And the needs of all the lonely people can feel overwhelming.

Someone once said that being in ministry is like being in a tank of piranhas; no one wants much of us, but everyone wants a little piece.  And often we feel empty and inadequate, barely able to keep our own souls and bodies together.  How can we feed all those lonely people?

Many years ago when I was a youth minister in a large suburban congregation I was working at the church on a Sunday afternoon making last minute preparations for two youth group meetings that evening.  Dressed in the typical youth minister uniform of blue jeans and sweatshirt, running late and feeling harried, I looked more like the church custodian than one of its pastors.  Having no time for any interruptions, I was dismayed to look up and see a man walk into the church office.  From the way he was groomed and dressed I knew he was probably homeless and looking for food or shelter or some kind of assistance.  When he asked if the pastor was around I immediately rationalized that he really meant “was the Sr. Minister around,” and without missing a beat I said, “No, I haven’t seen him.”  That stranger went away, still hungry, and 25 years later I am still living with the regret of not responding to his hunger. 

Sometimes we feel like the disciples out there in a lonely place with Jesus and a crowd of hungry people.  Jesus and his weary band of disciples had tried to get away from it all for some badly needed R & R, only to find there was no place to hide from all the lonely people.  The disciples  were probably frightened, having just heard that John the Baptist had been brutally beheaded by King Herod.  They needed time to grieve and regroup.  But even in those pre-Twitter days, people heard where Jesus was and their hunger drew them to him.  He, of course, had compassion on them and could not send them away.  He knew that when those hungering and thirsting for righteousness come knocking on our door, if we don’t feed them, they’ll stop off for junk food somewhere else on their way home from church.

You know who they are, the unemployed or underemployed, the sick and lame, the lonely, the broken-hearted, those suffering from doubts and fears and addictions, the abused, the single parents, confused teens and young adults, the elderly, those without health care.  There must be 5000 of them!!   We can’t possibly feed them all.  Let’s send them off to McDonalds or Taco Bell, Jesus, so they can find something for themselves to eat.  “No,” Jesus says to the disciples and to us, “You give them something to eat.”  “What,” we moan in disbelief.  “You don’t understand, Jesus.  We only have 5 loaves and two fish!”

John Westerhoff tells the story in his book Will Our Children Have Faith? of a young couple in a Roman Catholic church who desperately wanted to have children but seemed doomed to remain childless.  It wasn’t that they weren’t trying.  And when the normal reproductive process didn’t work they consulted the best medical practitioners they could find.  Still no baby.  Through several years of frustration and disappointment after disappointment the couple leaned heavily on the spiritual and moral support of their local priest, Father John, who prayed with and for them, comforted and consoled them.  Then one day when they thought all hope was gone a miracle happened and the young woman conceived.  She gave birth to a beautiful healthy boy and they named him John in honor of their priest.  Father John was thrilled to baptize little Johnny and enjoyed watching him grow into an inquisitive toddler.

When Johnny was almost two years old he was out in the front yard with his mother early one beautiful summer morning.  They were laughing and playing with a ball when their black lab chased the ball into the neighbor’s yard.  The mother went after the run-away puppy, momentarily taking her eyes off her son.  Johnny toddled after a butterfly and ended up in the driveway just as his father came rushing out of the house late for work.  Dad, not seeing Johnny behind the car, jumped behind the wheel and backed over Johnny, killing him instantly.

Father John rushed to the house as soon as heard of the tragedy.  When he got there he found the young couple devastated and in shock sitting on their bed holding each other.  The priest was speechless.  He could not muster any words that seemed anything more than pious platitudes or clichés; so he just sat on the edge of the bed and cried with them.

The funeral for Johnny was one of the hardest things Father John had ever done in 20 years of ministry.  A few days after the funeral he went by the family’s home to see how they were doing.  He was filled with dread and regret as he rang their doorbell because he had been so inadequate in addressing their unimaginable grief.  Much to his surprise the young wife greeted him with open arms and thanked him profusely for what he had done for them.  “But I didn’t do anything,” Father John protested.  “I couldn’t think of anything to say.  I just sat and cried.”

“I know,” she said.  “You gave us all that you had, and it was enough.”

The disciples want to send the crowds away because they have so little to offer them, just 5 loaves and 2 fish.  Jesus says, “You give them something to eat.”  Notice what happens next.  When the disciples tell Jesus what resources they have, he simply says, “Bring them here to me.”

 God doesn’t ask us to give more than we have.  That would be unfair, and we do not serve an unjust God.  God simply asks us to give ALL that we have.  Jesus gave us his all and asks the same of us in return.  And when we do, it’s enough.  God doesn’t ask those of us who can’t carry a tune in a bucket to sing solos in church, but we are asked to fully use the talents we have been blessed with, to share the resources we have with those who have less.  And when we entrust what we have, all that we have, to God, it is blessed and multiplied; and all those lonely people are fed.  And not only are they fed, they are all filled.  And not only are they all filled, there are enough left-overs to feed the next bunch of hungry, lonely pilgrims that are already coming down the road. 

When we feel overwhelmed and inadequate to respond to all the lonely people, remember these two things:  Jesus doesn’t call us and then go on sabbatical.  He is with us always, even to the end of the age.  He is always there to take our meager gifts and transform them into an overflowing cup of living water.  And most importantly, if we respond in faith and entrust God with all that we have, I promise you in Christ’s name, our five loaves and two fish will always be more than enough.

Parenting and Peacemaking

I wrote this post several years ago but found it especially relevant this week having just spent a couple of days caring for two wonderful energetic grandsons.

Peace lessons are not always easy to swallow.  I lost my cool and raised my voice with my four year-old granddaughter yesterday.  She recovered much more quickly than I, but the experience has helped me relearn a couple of lessons yet again.  We’ve been visiting with our kids for 5 days now – my step-son and his wife, and two children, ages 4 and 1.  Being with them is fun, but doing it 24/7 when I am not used to it is sometimes quite challenging.  Yesterday I knew my patience was wearing thin and should have given myself some time off from grandpa duty.  Instead I agreed to spend some time playing with the little ones when we would all have been much better served by some time apart.  That was the first lesson. – trusting my feelings and instincts instead of shoulding on myself.

The second lesson came as I observed my wife handle a similar situation with the four-year-old shortly after my “grandpa gaffe.”  Both scenarios were typical adult-preschooler power struggles.  But where I had let myself get hooked into the level of the four year-old, grandma stayed firm but calm and waited the little one out.  My wife stayed grounded and centered.  She didn’t respond from emotion but from a secure position of reason and authority.

How often do we miss out on peacemaking opportunities in interpersonal or international relationships because we forget these two simple lessons?  Taking just a few seconds to pause, breathe deeply and ground and center ourselves before we react to what others have said or done can make all the difference in the outcome and how all parties feel about themselves and each other.  Ground and center is the difference between making peace and escalating a conflicted situation, between a win/win and a lose/lose outcome.  Grounding and centering gives one time to reflect and assess reality and trust one’s feelings and instincts.  Proactive peacemaking happens when we know our own abilities and limits and are willing to ask for help when we need it instead of reacting from an emotional level. 

So, my goal for my next opportunity to interact with a four-year old, no matter what age or size he or she may be, is to ground and center myself and remember these lessons my granddaughter and my wonderful wife taught me.

Genesis 29: 15-28, “It’s not fair! You’re not the person I married!”

 Last week’s surprises for Jacob at Bethel (Genesis 28:10-22) are soon trumped by the big surprise he found in his bed the morning after his wedding!  There’s a famous scene in one of the Godfather movies where Jack Woltz is surprised, no horrified, to find a horse’s head in his bed.  Jacob is less shocked at the bait and switch Laban, his new father-in-law, pulls on him. But he is quite surprised and a bit angry, and rightfully so.  Jacob had a deal with Laban that was very specific.  Genesis 29 is very clear that Jacob loves Laban’s younger daughter Rachel.  He has it bad for Rachel, so much so that he agrees to work seven long years for Laban to earn Rachel’s hand in marriage.

 So imagine the look on Jacob’s face the first morning of his life as a married man.  He thought he had consummated his marriage to Rachel in the darkness of their wedding night, only to discover when the sun rose that he was with Laban’s older daughter, Leah, instead.

What are we to make of this strange and rather humorous tale that could be an episode of the TV sitcom “How I Met Your Mother?”  First, let’s suspend our disbelief about how this could actually happen.  We can speculate about how much wine Jacob drank at the wedding reception or how heavily veiled brides were in those days, but there are far more relevant issues in this story worth exploring for our lives today.

1.   There is sweet, ironic justice that Jacob, who had plotted and schemed to cheat his older brother out of his birthright, literally from birth, should now be the victim of deceit himself.  Dare we say “what goes around comes around” or more biblically, “we reap what we sow?”

2.   Both the Jacob and Esau story and the Leah and Rachel story involve issues of cultural sensitivity. The prevailing customs in those days were very patriarchal and sexist.  The eldest son got the birthright and lion’s share of the inheritance, and the eldest daughters were to have their marriages arranged and consummated before their younger sisters.  Jacob tries to overturn both of these traditions, and a good argument can be made that both of those cultural norms were unjust and in need of change.

How does such change happen most effectively?  First, by being aware and sensitive to what cultural norms and customs are.  President Richard Nixon ran afoul of several cultural norms in this country, leading to his resignation from the Presidency.  But one of the more humorous faux pas he made was on a trip to Latin America where, as he did everywhere, he flashed his famous “V” for victory sign to a large crowd gathered to greet him.  To his chagrin and that of his handlers, a lesson about avoiding Ugly American syndrome was learned the hard way.  In that culture the “V” gesture was used in the same way the obscene middle-finger salute is used in ours.  Oops!  

Once an unjust cultural custom is recognized it takes time and patience to change.  We cringe today to think of arranged marriages as they were done in Jacob’s time, but it took over 3000 years from that period of history before women were given the right to vote in our democratic process.  It has only been in our lifetime that the change was made in the wedding ritual so brides no longer have to promise to obey their husbands.  And in some wedding ceremonies the bride is still “given away” by her father and/or mother as if she is a piece of property being transferred to another owner.  Cultural customs change at a glacial pace, but that does not make the change less valid or necessary.  I am always pleased to share with couples in pre-marital counseling that the United Methodist marriage ceremony 20 or 30 years ago replaced the “giving away” of the bride with asking both families for their blessing on the marriage.

3.   “That isn’t Fair!”  Even if the rules are not perfect, and even if Jacob got his just desserts, there’s a part of us that recognizes the unfairness of what Laban did to Jacob.  Why didn’t he tell Jacob up front about the necessity of the older daughter being married first?  We don’t know, but the relevant question for us is how do we respond when life deals us a bad hand?  When something isn’t fair, are we tempted to fall into the victim mode and have a pity party.  Jacob starts down that path when he says to Laban, “What is this you have done to me?   Why have you deceived me?”  (Note the victim’s focus is always what has been done by someone or something To Me.)  But then Jacob seems to suddenly mature as Laban explains the customs of that culture to him.  Jacob may have prayed that part of the serenity prayer that says, “God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change.”  Because when Laban says, “OK, here’s the deal.  Work for me seven more years and you can have Rachel too,” the text simply says, “Jacob did so.”

 A very simple three-word sentence speaks volumes.  “Jacob did so.”  When faced with tragedy, failure, grief, or unpleasant circumstances that cannot be undone, the sooner we accept reality and ask ourselves, “what next?” and do what is required, the better it is for everyone.  My six year-old grandson was in the hospital this spring and had to have an endoscopy and a colonoscopy done, which are never fun for anyone.  This little boy was miserable during the prep and long wait without food or drink for his tests to be done, and he let us know it.  So when the nurse came in to tell him she needed to do another enema, all of us, the nurse especially, were flabbergasted that he simply said “OK” and rolled over on his tummy.  He had accepted what he couldn’t change and knew that fighting it would only make things worse. 

4.   “You aren’t the person I married!”   Can’t you just hear Jacob saying that to Leah on the morning after?  All of us who are married have felt that at times, haven’t we?  We can be on our good behavior while dating, but sharing a bathroom and a TV remote and a closet 24/7 will expose anyone’s true nature.  No matter how long you’ve known your spouse before the wedding, there are always surprises.  Some of them are pleasant and bring smiles to our hearts.  Other irritating habits or quirks discovered on the honeymoon quickly help us learn why that “for better or worse” part is in the marriage vows.  We are all fallible human beings; we all have flaws and weaknesses.  Sure, we all know that the “happily ever after” ending to love stories is just a fairy tale, but it is still a rude awakening when the bubble of our own romantic notion bursts and the hope that somehow we are exempt from that reality of the human condition is shattered. 

That’s when we learn that love is not something we fall into or out of, it’s a choice we make every day, even on those day we don’t like each other very much.  Change is inevitable.  All of us are either growing or regressing. The journey of life is like one of those moving walkways at the airport.  You can’t just mark time and stay where you are.   When we bemoan the fact that our spouse is not the person we married, aren’t we really saying he or she isn’t the ideal, romanticized person we hoped we were marrying? 

 Judith Versed, in Love & Guilt & the Meaning of Love, came up with a humorous distinction between love and infatuation that applies here:

“Infatuation is when you think that he’s as gorgeous as Robert Redford, as pure as Solzhenitsyn, as funny as Woody Allen, as athletic as Jimmy Connors and as smart as Albert Einstein.
Love is when you realize that he’s as gorgeous as Woody Allen, as smart as Jimmy Connors, as funny as Solzhenitsyn, as athletic as Albert Einstein and nothing like Robert Redford in any category. But you’ll take him anyway.”

Even if it were possible, would you really want to go back to living with or being the immature person you were at 20 or 25?  Sure, it would be nice to have the stamina and energy we had as teenagers or twenty-somethings, but do we really want to give up the hard-fought lessons and wisdom we’ve earned from the years of life experience we’ve had since then?  Selective amnesia fools us into believing the good old days really were.  The theme song to the old Barbra Streisand and Robert Redford movie, “The Way We Were,” says it well: “what’s too painful to remember, we simply choose to forget.” 

Rather than wishing for the perfect spouse or the perfect life and being frustrated because perfection is not humanly possible, our marriages and families and all relationships can be greatly improved if we heed the advice of Wilferd Peterson, who says in “The Art of a Good Marriage,” “It is not just about marrying the right partner, it is being the right partner.”

We can also learn a great deal from our old friend Jacob, who accepts what he cannot change, that Leah is not the woman he thought he had married, and makes the relationship work anyway.  Thank God the same is true for our relationship with our Creator.  God must wake up most mornings and look at us and say, “These aren’t the people I created!”  But God loves us anyway, “for better or worse, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health.”  And God’s deal is even better than marriage, which is “till death do us part.”  God’s guarantee of love is not just for this life, not for 5 years or 50,000 miles, whichever comes first.  God’s love is unconditional and forever.  Thanks be to God.